On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:45:21AM -0700, Dimitre Novatchev scripsit:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Michael Kay <mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Personally I'm happy to go to three or four lines for an XPath expression,
but beyond that I start to feel uncomfortable with it; can't really explain
why.
In my Balisage-2013 article "Programming in XPath 3.0" [1], I raised
the need for an XPath "import clause".
Such a thing would be lovely.
While we're extending XPath, can we have support for named, referenceable
predicate definitions? Preferably composable ones, so I can combine a
group of named predicates under another name?
-- Graydon, who is going to be embarrassed if that's snuck into 3.0
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--