On 31/03/2014 17:08, Michael Kay wrote:
While we're extending XPath, can we have support for named,
referenceable predicate definitions?
Isn't that the same thing as a function?
Michael Kay Saxonica
Yes, but you didn't quote the important bit:
-- Graydon, who is going to be embarrassed if that's snuck into 3.0
Function definitions have in fact snuck in to XPath 3 by way of the let
clause and inline function definitions.
David
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--