The question doesn't make sense. You cannot >>compare performance of
programming >>languages or specifications.
The question makes sense if you read the original question ..
Which says when calling within java.
On 9 February 2016 at 04:49, Vasu Chakkera vasucv(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com <
xsl-list-service(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com> wrote:
On 9 February 2016 at 04:49, Vasu Chakkera vasucv(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com <
xsl-list-service(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com> wrote:
Any inputs in how the memory is handled in xpath vs jaxb ? For a xml of a
decent size (that a DOM can handle ) is there any preference of one or the
other in terms of performance ?
Than
The question doesn't make sense. You cannot compare performance of
programming languages or specifications. You might do this for
*implementations,* and even then it typically varies, depending on the use
case. And xpath and jaxb don't have the same use case domains.
-W
XSL-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list>
EasyUnsubscribe <-list/620062> (by
email <>)
--~----------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
EasyUnsubscribe: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/1167547
or by email: xsl-list-unsub(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
--~--