xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [xsl] XSLT repetition constructs

2019-03-08 02:44:18
from [Dave Pawson dave(_dot_)pawson(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com] [Permanent Link] 
On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 08:40, Michael Kay mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com
<xsl-list-service(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com> wrote:


Because if $a is an empty sequence (which is the situation on the first 
call), then $a[last()] is an empty sequence, and ($x + ()) returns an empty 
sequence, not $x.


I'm sure I'm not the only one thinking that sounds illogical Mike? (DC?)
I'd appreciated the 'logic' behind that decision (maths?)

regards


-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
--~----------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
EasyUnsubscribe: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/1167547
or by email: xsl-list-unsub(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
--~--
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [xsl] XSLT repetition constructs, Michael Kay mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com
Next by Date:  Re: [xsl] XSLT repetition constructs, Michael Kay mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com
Previous by Thread:  Re: [xsl] XSLT repetition constructs, Michael Kay mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com
Next by Thread:  Re: [xsl] XSLT repetition constructs, Michael Kay mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]