Re: [xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json() function useful

Hi Wendell,

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 1:58 AM Wendell Piez wapiez(_at_)wendellpiez(_dot_)com <
xsl-list-service(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com> wrote:

I think good tools (like oXygen in this case) do make it
possible to be much more ambitious with XSLT, if only because they
make it possible to visualize, represent and manage more complex
processes, such (in this case for example) as 2-stage or multi-stage
pipelines producing specialized serialization formats including JSON.


I agree. Very well articulated.

Aren't we saying
that good tools make difficult things easier, if you know how to use
them?



Definitely.

I do wonder who you have in mind when you talk about the
"average developer" as mostly, she or he would not be writing XSLT,
would they?


The phrase "average developer", I wrote was a bit casual. I probably meant
average XSLT developer.




-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
--~----------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
EasyUnsubscribe: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/1167547
or by email: xsl-list-unsub(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
--~--

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json() function useful, Mukul Gandhi gandhi(_dot_)mukul(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com Re: [xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json() function useful, Michael Kay mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com Re: [xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json() function useful, Mukul Gandhi gandhi(_dot_)mukul(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com Re: [xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json() function useful, Mukul Gandhi gandhi(_dot_)mukul(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com Re: [xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json() function useful, Martin Honnen martin(_dot_)honnen(_at_)gmx(_dot_)de Re: [xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json() function useful, Mukul Gandhi gandhi(_dot_)mukul(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com Re: [xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json() function useful, Martin Honnen martin(_dot_)honnen(_at_)gmx(_dot_)de Re: [xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json() function useful, Mukul Gandhi gandhi(_dot_)mukul(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com Message not available Re: [xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json() function useful, Mukul Gandhi gandhi(_dot_)mukul(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com Re: [xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json() function useful, Wendell Piez wapiez(_at_)wendellpiez(_dot_)com Re: [xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json() function useful, Mukul Gandhi gandhi(_dot_)mukul(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com <= Re: [xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json() function useful, Christophe Marchand cmarchand(_at_)oxiane(_dot_)com Re: [xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json() function useful, Michele R Combs mrrothen(_at_)syr(_dot_)edu Re: [xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json() function useful, David Maus lists(_at_)dmaus(_dot_)name Re: [xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json() function useful, Willem Van Lishout willemvanlishout(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com Re: [xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json() function useful, Martin Honnen martin(_dot_)honnen(_at_)gmx(_dot_)de Re: [xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json() function useful, Martin Honnen martin(_dot_)honnen(_at_)gmx(_dot_)de Re: [xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json() function useful, Wendell Piez wapiez(_at_)wendellpiez(_dot_)com

Previous by Date:	[xsl] [ANN] Call for Participation: Symposium on Markup Vocabulary Customization, Tommie Usdin btusdin(_at_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Next by Date:	Re: [xsl] XSLT code for function fn:fold-right(), Mukul Gandhi gandhi(_dot_)mukul(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com
Previous by Thread:	Re: [xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json() function useful, Wendell Piez wapiez(_at_)wendellpiez(_dot_)com
Next by Thread:	Re: [xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json() function useful, Christophe Marchand cmarchand(_at_)oxiane(_dot_)com
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]