Dear Liam,
Thanks for your proposal! As far as I can see, your solution does not
work in all cases. If I understand correctly, the problem is that your
formula works only when the current node is "foo", but not when it is
non-"foo".
By the way, there is a little syntax error in the formula, a missing ")"
before the final "]".
Wolfhart
On 18-02-21 00:18, Liam R. E. Quin liam(_at_)fromoldbooks(_dot_)org wrote:
On Thu, 2021-02-18 at 01:33 +0000, Wolfhart Totschnig
wolfhart(_dot_)totschnig(_at_)mail(_dot_)udp(_dot_)cl wrote:
Dear list,
I want to select all following sibling elements of name "foo" up to
the first non-"foo" element.
So, given that this is XSLT 1,
following-sibling::*[(name() = 'foo') and (
count(preceding-sibling::*[ not(name() = 'foo') ])
= count(current()/preceding-sibling::*[ not(name() = 'foo') ])
]
maybe?
Liam
--~----------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
EasyUnsubscribe: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/1167547
or by email: xsl-list-unsub(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
--~--