On Thu, 2021-02-18 at 04:00 +0000, Wolfhart Totschnig
wolfhart(_dot_)totschnig(_at_)mail(_dot_)udp(_dot_)cl wrote:
Dear Liam,
Thanks for your proposal! As far as I can see, your solution does not
work in all cases. If I understand correctly, the problem is that
your
formula works only when the current node is "foo", but not when it is
non-"foo".
Possibly i was too literal in reading the question - or misreading.
By the way, there is a little syntax error in the formula, a missing
")"
before the final "]".
Proves i didn't test it :) :)
With XPath 1 you tend (or i do) to use count() a lot.
--
Liam Quin, https://www.delightfulcomputing.com/
Available for XML/Document/Information Architecture/XSLT/
XSL/XQuery/Web/Text Processing/A11Y training, work & consulting.
Barefoot Web-slave, antique illustrations: http://www.fromoldbooks.org
--~----------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
EasyUnsubscribe: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/1167547
or by email: xsl-list-unsub(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
--~--