Hi Dimitre,
That is good advice about functions – I will keep it in mind!
Hi everyone,
So I ran into a limitation of using document node-set variables in template
match expressions:
<!-- put document nodes in $trim-elements -->
<xsl:variable name="trim-elements"
select="//(desc|dt|entry|glossterm|li|p|shortdesc|title)"/>
<!-- reference elements in $trim-elements -->
<xsl:template match="text()
[matches(., '^\s+')]
[ancestor::*[. intersect
$trim-elements][not(descendant::*[. intersect $trim-elements])]]
[not(ancestor-or-self::node()
[ancestor::*[. intersect
$trim-elements][not(descendant::*[. intersect $trim-elements])]]
[preceding-sibling::node()])]">
When I constructed a temporary <p> node in a variable:
xsl:variable name="temporary-p">
<p><xsl:copy-of select=”…blah blah…”></p>
</xsl:variable>
then called <xsl:apply-templates> to apply the template:
<xsl:apply-templates select="$temporary-p"/>
the template did not get applied. This makes perfect sense – my temporary <p>
variable does not contain any document nodes at all, so the template match
expression would never match!
But with Dimitre’s advice about functions fresh in my mind, I converted my
document-node variable into a node-type function:
<xsl:function name="mine:is-trim-element" as="xs:boolean">
<xsl:param name="elt" as="node()"/>
<xsl:value-of select="exists($elt[self::desc or self::dt or self::endnote
or self::entry or self::example-title or self::glossterm or self::li or
self::msg-severity or self::p or self::shortdesc or self::title or
self::value-allowed or self::value-default or self::value-type])"/>
</xsl:function>
Now I can use the function instead of the variable in the match expression:
<xsl:template match="text()
[matches(., '^\s+')]
[ancestor::*[mine:is-trim-element(.)][not(descendant::*[mine:is-trim-element(.)])]]
[not(ancestor-or-self::node()
[ancestor::*[mine:is-trim-element(.)][not(descendant::*[mine:is-trim-element(.)])]]
[preceding-sibling::node()[not(mine:is-invisible(.))]])]">
and the template applies as expected to my temporary variable!
Follow-up question – is there some syntactic sugar that would allow me to write
self::(a|b|c)
instead of
(self::a or self::b or self::c)
or some other way of testing the element type in $elt altogether? I have
another function that matches several dozen element types, and a more compact
representation would be nice. I thought about matching local-name() against a
list of tag names using “intersect”, but that is not much shorter and it seems
operationally clunkier.
Thanks, this has been an enjoyable exercise for learning!
* Chris
--~----------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
EasyUnsubscribe: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/1167547
or by email: xsl-list-unsub(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
--~--