Of course not, please we don't want, neither need/should, do that !
If we decide to do that, let's say to the world "folks, IETF lost its
direction".
Regards,
Jordi
De: Gert Doering <gert(_at_)space(_dot_)net>
Responder a: owner-v6ops(_at_)ops(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org
Fecha: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 22:48:16 +0100
Para: Valdis(_dot_)Kletnieks(_at_)vt(_dot_)edu
CC: Tony Hain <alh-ietf(_at_)tndh(_dot_)net>, 'Harald Tveit Alvestrand'
<harald(_at_)alvestrand(_dot_)no>, v6ops(_at_)ops(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org,
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, 'Pekka Savola'
<pekkas(_at_)netcore(_dot_)fi>
Asunto: Re: Stepping down as IETF chair in March - & - RE: A personal take on
WG's priorities..
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 04:31:46PM -0500,
Valdis(_dot_)Kletnieks(_at_)vt(_dot_)edu wrote:
So 40% isn't even *allocated* yet (saying that we're probably burning /8's
faster than needed, but only 36% of the available space is actually routed.
Sounds to me like we've got more time than 52 months, if we start doing
stuff now to increase the usage efficiencies....
Do we really *want* that?
I'd rather go for "legacy-free networks". Ditch v4, build proper v6
networks.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 66629 (65398)
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster(_at_)Space(_dot_)Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
**********************************
Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit
Presentations and videos on line at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the
individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that
any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information, including attached files, is prohibited.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf