On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Anthony G. Atkielski wrote:
John Cowan writes:
Filtering him out individually, as I do, is insufficient: one still must
read the polite or exasperated responses of others. I am almost at the
point where I will filter any posting that so much as *mentions* him.
Why don't you do that, then, so that he need not be banned just for
your convenience?
Why must each and every WG member be required to filter a person's
postings? Much more convenient to do so in one place.
Maybe you should try participating in a WG trying to be constructive
sometime. As far as I can see from quick googling and browsing
various I-D/RFC data, you've never made any contribution to any IETF
WG at all, just more or less heated and/or trollish messages at
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org(_dot_)
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf