--On 24. januar 2006 20:46 +0100 Jeroen Massar <jeroen(_at_)unfix(_dot_)org>
wrote:
My proposal to solve this issue but keeping everybody happy:
Two mailinglists: <wg>@ietf.org + full.<wg>@ietf.org
full.<wg>@ is completely open, anybody can post anything they want
though hopefully on topic on the subject of the workinggroup and of
course based on the source address having a subscription *1
full.<wg>@ is subscribed to <wg>@ thus full.wg gets everything
preserving, at least parts, of the freedom of speech that is wanted and
for the people who want to read a lot of mail everyday.
In fact this has been implemented at least once that I know of - on the
DNSO GA mailing list. The "full" version had relatively few subscribers.
You can find the archives of that experiment at
<http://www.dnso.org/dnso/gaarchives.html> - it's probably difficult to
guess from the archives whether it was successful; better ask someone who
was there at a time whether they think it worked.
Another variant is the ietf-censored version of the IETF list that I ran
for a while, but left to others when becoming IETF chair - google claims
that <http://vesuvio.ipv6.tilab.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf_censored> is a
current page for it. Some people liked it; I don't know what filters are
currently in place for it, but it doesn't seem to be working - archives
have spam in them, but no IETF list traffic, so I guess it's not working.
Harald
pgpfTwGfgYRDN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf