spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Council log censored

2005-07-10 16:51:39
In 
<Pine(_dot_)LNX(_dot_)4(_dot_)62(_dot_)0507101611010(_dot_)23607(_at_)sokol(_dot_)elan(_dot_)net>
 "william(at)elan.net" <william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net> writes:

We have not forgotten about the appeal deadline.  There are just some
things that need to be found out before we can make any further decisions,
and the e-mail authentication summit poses a good opportunity for that.

Even if some agreement is made, you should understand that such agreement
should be verifiable by the time appeal period expires. What this means
is that MS must prepare updated drafts and submit them no longer then
first day after IETF conference blockout period - don't just believe
them on their word, its not good enough as we've seen at MARID.

Thanks for the advice William.  I'm serious.  One of the dangers of
not working in public is that you don't have as many eyes double
checking things.  In this particular case, I think we all very much
aware of this stuff, but again, that is one of the downsides to
private discussions.


One thing I would like to encourage is for people to lower their
expectations.  We had less than an hour's discussion in private, and
anyone who has read the SPF council logs knows how little we can
accompilish in an hour's time.  Please don't expect any sort of grand
plan or elaborate results.


-wayne


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>