wayne wrote:
Julian is *way* behind on the meeting minutes.
The IESG is now at <http://www.ietf.org/iesg/iesg.2005-03-31> -
Council at <http://spf.mehnle.net/Council_Meeting/2005-02-09>
or <http://spf.mehnle.net/Council_Resolution/22> (2005-04-27).
The directory views <http://spf.mehnle.net/Council_Resolution/>
and <http://spf.mehnle.net/Council_Meeting/> don't work at the
moment.
Meeting minutes are lower priority.
For the interested public something like the IESG "datatracker"
is _all_ that makes them any different from a "secret society
for the destruction of the Internet" - if they are lucky. That
is the idea of "glasnost" or transparency.
Meng said that it would be hard to schedule a meeting, so he
is going try and set the times. I trust that he will.
Now after Greg has accepted to join the SPF Council that point
is not more a live-and-death matter, but you were so >.< close
to a potentially blocked Council.
Anyone who wants to know why Chuck resigned will have to ask
Chuck.
I hope he will explain this stunt. These must have been very
"interesting" 77 minutes from his agenda to his resignation on
2005-07-07.
There are lots of reasons for resigning that are purely
personal
Not within 77 minutes, unless somebody died (or similar cases),
and then he could have said "for personal reasons". I stick to
my theory, you and Julian joined the opposition, Greg supports
the "PRA is no real problem" position, and my comfortable 60%
of imaginary Council "shares" just plummeted to a mere 20%.
Chuck had this no-nonsense focus - forcing you to pull in one
direction in critical situations. Like Meng talking about his
pet fantasies "PRA is no real problem" or "FAIL was a bad idea"
again. And again, And again.
Bye, Frank
--
<http://www.OpenSPF.org/> "currently 171 pledge signatures"