-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
The only case I can see for private discussions is for attempts to get
funding. I do understand that some things might for inteligence
purposes not be disclosed imediately, but should be disclosed. I do not
remember the final post disclosing what the special work group did.
That was mentioned in the logs in Dec, Jan, and Feb. I may have missed
it but I really do not see the post.
The AMSG committee[1] never took off. It has already been planned to be
declared dead (i.e. disconnected from the SPF project) at the next council
meeting.
Please be open with what the council is doing. If there is really some
strategic reason, I may be able to accept some delay, but all too often
it seems that it is never made public.
I already said we would disclose our current thinking soon.
"all too often"? If you want to know about any other allegedly undisclosed
issues, please speak up.
Julian,
Council Member.
References:
1. http://spf.mehnle.net/Council_Resolution/9
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC06IKwL7PKlBZWjsRAloZAJ9KEInVDGSFJeBIsXf5octlE6eNwwCeK93U
TdwTw8QX7Kp2r+Y8kGPl7Es=
=ai9t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----