Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?

I fear that this insignificant little question is going to take more of
Nathaniels time than we deserve to request.  Lets see if we can set up
tactics and strategies for getting around it all.

Lets cite the new stnadard (someone needs to get a copy for Nathaniel,
and for NIC.DDN.MIL or for Jon Postel's files), and also be explicit
about the <CRLF> business to be sure we do not confuse anyone.

What else should we note in RFC822bis to avoid connfusions, or trouble?

Best...\Stef

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: text --> IA5 ?, (continued) Re: text --> IA5 ?, Neil Katin Re: text --> IA5 ?, John Noerenberg Re: text --> IA5 ?, Einar Stefferud Re: text --> IA5 ?, Dave Crocker Re: text --> IA5 ?, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: text --> IA5 ?, John Noerenberg Re: text --> IA5 ?, Einar Stefferud Re: text --> IA5 ?, John C Klensin SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, Einar Stefferud Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, John C Klensin Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, Einar Stefferud <= Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, Einar Stefferud Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, John C Klensin Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, Greg Vaudreuil Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, Dave Crocker Re: text --> IA5 ?, Risto Kankkunen Re: text --> IA5 ?, Nathaniel Borenstein

Previous by Date:	Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, John C Klensin
Next by Date:	Re: text --> IA5 ?, Dave Crocker
Previous by Thread:	Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, John C Klensin
Next by Thread:	Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, Nathaniel Borenstein
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]