IETF 822 (date)

April 30, 1991

Please don't dump version numbers., Bill Cattey, 20:11
Re: X.400 bodyparts and related matters, Peter Vanderbilt, 17:49
Re: X.400 bodyparts and related matters, Peter Vanderbilt, 17:07
Re: a plea for simplicity, Mark Crispin, 15:47
Re: Another approach to Encodings, Bill Janssen, 15:35
a counter-proposal for text, Mark Crispin, 15:03
Re: TEXT is good enough, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 13:55
Re: character sets, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 13:50
multi-lingual support, rja7m, 10:25
Re: a plea for simplicity, jwn2, 08:12
Re: a plea for simplicity, Nathaniel Borenstein, 06:53
Re: character sets, Erik M. van der Poel, 06:01
Re: TEXT is good enough, Einar Stefferud, 03:29
Re: a plea for simplicity, Einar Stefferud, 03:28
Re: Another approach to Encodings, Einar Stefferud, 03:28
Re: X.400 bodyparts and related matters, Einar Stefferud, 03:28
Re: X.400 bodyparts and related matters, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 02:57
Re: character sets, Bob, 02:17

April 29, 1991

Re: character sets, Erik M. van der Poel, 22:54
Re: TEXT is good enough, Mark Crispin, 22:26
Re: TEXT is good enough, Erik M. van der Poel, 21:14
Re: X.400 bodyparts and related matters, Peter Vanderbilt, 16:24
Re: a plea for simplicity, Mark Crispin, 16:01
Re: character sets, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 15:39
Re: a plea for simplicity, Nathaniel Borenstein, 13:24
Re: Another approach to Encodings, Nathaniel Borenstein, 13:09
Re: Another approach to Encodings, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 13:04
X.400 bodyparts and related matters, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 12:40
Re: Another approach to Encodings, Nathaniel Borenstein, 11:47
Re: Another approach to Encodings, Greg Vaudreuil, 11:33
Another approach to Encodings, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:20
Re: multiple Content-Encoding:'s, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:19
Re: Postfix, redux, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:19
Re: character sets, Greg Vaudreuil, 08:10
Re: a plea for simplicity, Craig_Everhart, 07:28
Re: remove X.400 types, Craig_Everhart, 07:15
TEXT is good enough, Mark Crispin, 02:29
a plea for simplicity, Mark Crispin, 02:23
Re: character sets, Erik M. van der Poel, 00:30

April 28, 1991

Re: UUencode, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 23:13
Re: UUencode, lyndon, 21:56
Re: UUencode, leo j mclaughlin iii, 18:03
Re: remove X.400 types, Bob, 15:26
Re: character sets, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 15:06
ISO-IR-60, Erik M. van der Poel, 03:03
character sets, Erik M. van der Poel, 03:02

April 27, 1991

Re: ISO 2022, Einar Stefferud, 19:06
Re: remove X.400 types, Einar Stefferud, 18:56
RFC-XXX and X.400 mappings.., Valdis Kletnieks, 18:02
remove X.400 types, Peter Vanderbilt, 17:40
Re: Part versus MultiPart, continued, Peter Vanderbilt, 17:22
Philosophy, Bob, 17:21
et VISUAL=emacs, Peter Vanderbilt, 17:07
Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 13:16
Part versus MultiPart, continued, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 12:50
Re: What's the 'part' in 'multipart'?, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 03:30
ISO 2022, Erik M. van der Poel, 02:32
Re: UUencode, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 02:09
New draft and gateways, Dan Oscarsson, 02:02
Re: Content-Label, Einar Stefferud, 01:18
Re: what should Content-Encoding cover?, Erik E. Fair, 00:16

April 26, 1991

Re: What's the 'part' in 'multipart'?, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 23:53
Re: UUencode, Keith Moore, 19:55
Re: UUencode, John C Klensin, 18:39
Re: What's the 'part' in 'multipart'?, Peter Vanderbilt, 17:35
Re: UUencode, leo j mclaughlin iii, 17:18
Re: What's the 'part' in 'multipart'?, Peter Vanderbilt, 16:23
Re: ISO-CHARSET-TYPE -- some comments, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 15:17
Re: what should Content-Encoding cover?, Bill Janssen, 15:07
Re: Postfix, redux, Vincent Lau, 15:03
Re: multiple Content-Encoding:'s, David Herron, 14:11
Re: What's the 'part' in 'multipart'?, Nathaniel Borenstein, 13:27
Re: What's the 'part' in 'multipart'?, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 13:19
Re: multiple Content-Encoding:'s, Neil Katin, 13:15
Postfix, redux, Nathaniel Borenstein, 11:46
Re: multiple Content-Encoding:'s, Nathaniel Borenstein, 11:32
What's the 'part' in 'multipart'?, Neil Katin, 11:06
Re: Content-Label, Einar Stefferud, 10:26
Re: Content-Label, Nathaniel Borenstein, 10:21
Re: multiple Content-Encoding:'s, Nathaniel Borenstein, 10:07
Re: multiple Content-Encoding:'s, Einar Stefferud, 09:35
Re: multiple Content-Encoding:'s, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:57
Re: RFC-XXXX, section 3.1, minor clarification needed., Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:46
Re: multiple Content-Encoding:'s, Greg Vaudreuil, 08:11
RFC-XXXX, 'content-encoding'., Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD), 08:08
RFC-XXXX, section 3.1, minor clarification needed., Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD), 07:54
Re: support for all content types, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 07:23
Re: Content-Label, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:12
Re: multiple Content-Encoding:'s, Nathaniel Borenstein, 06:48
Re: UUencode, Nathaniel Borenstein, 06:41
Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Nathaniel Borenstein, 06:39
Re: support for all content types, Greg Vaudreuil, 06:13
Re: support for all content types, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 05:04
Re: support for all content types, Erik M. van der Poel, 03:07

April 25, 1991

Re: UUencode, David Herron, 21:13
Re: Some comments to new draft, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 19:45
Re: Some comments to new draft, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 18:55
Re: UUencode, Erik M. van der Poel, 17:57
Re: multiple body parts of different encodings, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 17:06
multiple Content-Encoding:'s, David Herron, 15:55
INTERIM WORKING GROUP MEETINGS, Greg Vaudreuil, 15:26
Re: UUencode, David Herron, 15:09
Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Neil Katin, 15:03
Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Greg Vaudreuil, 14:11
Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Vincent Lau, 12:57
multiple body parts of different encodings, Paul A Vixie, 10:47
Re: Some comments to new draft, David Herron, 10:46
the LZJU90 doc Nathaniel referred to, Robert Ullmann, 09:50
Re: support for all content types, rja7m, 08:07
Re: Some comments to new draft, rja7m, 07:46
Re: UUencode, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:35
Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:32
Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:28
Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Tom Morris - Digital Equipment - Valbonne, France 25-Apr-1991 1542, 07:17
Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:00
Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Nathaniel Borenstein, 06:52
Re: compressed as Content-Encoding, rather than Content-Type, Nathaniel Borenstein, 06:39
Re: TEXT version of Draft RFC, Nathaniel Borenstein, 06:32
Re: support for all content types, Greg Vaudreuil, 05:50
support for all content types, Erik M. van der Poel, 05:08
codeset conversion by gateways, Erik M. van der Poel, 05:02
Some comments to new draft, Dan Oscarsson, 01:44
Re: support for all character sets, Erik M. van der Poel, 01:28

April 24, 1991

recursive RFC-XXXX, Erik M. van der Poel, 21:59
Re: compressed as Content-Encoding, rather than Content-Type, Erik M. van der Poel, 19:54
Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Neil Katin, 18:55
Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Bill Janssen, 18:35
Re: compressed as Content-Encoding, rather than Content-Type, Bill Janssen, 18:17
Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Einar Stefferud, 16:39
Re: Comments on Draft RFC, David Herron, 14:40
Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Vincent Lau, 13:44
Re: TEXT version of Draft RFC, Craig_Everhart, 12:48
Re: TEXT version of Draft RFC, Nathaniel Borenstein, 12:27
Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Nathaniel Borenstein, 12:26
Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Einar Stefferud, 10:15
Re: TEXT version of Draft RFC, Einar Stefferud, 09:57
Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:56
Re: TEXT version of Draft RFC, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:39
Re: support for all character sets, Greg Vaudreuil, 06:46
Re: TEXT version of Draft RFC, James M Galvin, 06:32
support for all character sets, Erik M. van der Poel, 05:59
Re: Encoded-Variable header, Erik M. van der Poel, 00:01

April 23, 1991

Comments on Draft RFC, Vincent Lau, 22:46
Re: ISO-CHARSET-TYPE -- some comments, Erik M. van der Poel, 21:45
Re: TEXT version of Draft RFC, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 13:32
Re: Encoded-Variable header, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 12:47
Re: ISO-CHARSET-TYPE -- some comments, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 12:41
Re: A Kinder, Gentler New Draft, Craig_Everhart, 12:31
Re: TEXT version of Draft RFC, Greg Vaudreuil, 11:54
Re: A Kinder, Gentler New Draft, Nathaniel Borenstein, 11:22
Re: A Kinder, Gentler New Draft, David Herron, 10:03
Re: Encoded-Variable header, Nathaniel Borenstein, 06:25
Re: A Kinder, Gentler New Draft, Nathaniel Borenstein, 06:19
Re: A Kinder, Gentler New Draft, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 04:59
Encoded-Variable header, Erik M. van der Poel, 02:17
Re: A Kinder, Gentler New Draft, Bill Janssen, 01:31

April 22, 1991

Quoted-Printable -- some problems, Erik M. van der Poel, 23:27
ISO-CHARSET-TYPE -- some comments, Erik M. van der Poel, 23:02
PostScript verison of Draft RFC, Nathaniel Borenstein, 10:21
TEXT version of Draft RFC, Nathaniel Borenstein, 10:20
A Kinder, Gentler New Draft, Nathaniel Borenstein, 10:18

April 21, 1991

Re: Strawman proposal, Bob, 19:35

April 20, 1991

Re: Spelling "ASCII" in ECMA or ISO, Einar Stefferud, 22:16
Re: RFC-87gtwys (was: smtp charter (revised) ), John C Klensin, 16:50
Re: RFC-87gtwys (was: smtp charter (revised) ), David Herron, 13:07
Re: Spelling "ASCII" in ECMA or ISO, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 10:58

April 19, 1991

Character set identification, rja7m, 07:26
Re: Spelling "ASCII" in ECMA or ISO, Nathaniel Borenstein, 06:28

April 18, 1991

Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, John C Klensin, 23:07
Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, Peter Vanderbilt, 20:26
Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, Einar Stefferud, 18:40
Spelling "ASCII" in ECMA or ISO, John C Klensin, 16:16
Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 12:46

April 15, 1991

Please add me, Daniel Chaney, 06:14

April 12, 1991

Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, Nathaniel Borenstein, 06:04

April 11, 1991

Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, Greg Vaudreuil, 13:33
Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, John C Klensin, 12:20
Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, jwn2, 12:19
Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, Einar Stefferud, 11:42
Re: text --> IA5 ?, Nathaniel Borenstein, 10:15
Re: ietf-822 charter, Dave Crocker, 08:52
ietf-822 charter, Greg Vaudreuil, 06:41
Re: Why We Disagree So Much... A Thought, Nathaniel Borenstein, 06:10
Re: text --> IA5 ?, Nathaniel Borenstein, 06:04
Re: text --> IA5 ?, Risto Kankkunen, 05:56
Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, Nathaniel Borenstein, 05:53

April 10, 1991

Re: Why We Disagree So Much... A Thought, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 22:37
Re: Why We Disagree So Much... A Thought, Einar Stefferud, 22:33
Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, Dave Crocker, 21:41
Re: text --> IA5 ?, Dave Crocker, 21:33
Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, Einar Stefferud, 21:12
Re: SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, John C Klensin, 20:13
Why We Disagree So Much... A Thought, David Robinson, 19:21
SIGH! Re: text --> IA5 ?, Einar Stefferud, 16:02
Re: text --> IA5 ?, John C Klensin, 08:35

April 09, 1991

Re: text --> IA5 ?, Einar Stefferud, 22:55
Re: text --> IA5 ?, John Noerenberg, 18:18
Re: text --> IA5 ?, Einar Stefferud, 17:16
Re: text --> IA5 ?, John Noerenberg, 14:48
Re: text --> IA5 ?, Neil Katin, 13:59
[no subject], , 12:36
Re: text --> IA5 ?, Einar Stefferud, 12:26
Re: text --> IA5 ?, Einar Stefferud, 11:58
Re: text --> IA5 ?, John C Klensin, 11:41
Re: text --> IA5 ?, Einar Stefferud, 11:16
Re: text --> IA5 ?, Brian Wideen, 10:00
Re: text --> IA5 ?, John C Klensin, 08:30
Compression, and nested encodings, Greg Vaudreuil, 08:07
Re: text --> IA5 ?, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:17
Re: text --> IA5 ?, Bruce Howard, 00:33

April 08, 1991

Re: text --> IA5 ?, Einar Stefferud, 18:16
Re: Inline excerpts (was: Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for...), Einar Stefferud, 16:57
Re: text --> IA5 ?, Einar Stefferud, 16:57
Re: text --> IA5 ?, Einar Stefferud, 14:39
Re: text --> IA5 ?, Vincent Lau, 13:22
Re: text --> IA5 ?, Nathaniel Borenstein, 11:55
Re: Inline excerpts (was: Re: Another look at 8 bit transport for...), John C Klensin, 08:51
text --> IA5 ?, Walt Daniels, 08:38
Re: text --> IA5 ?, jwn2, 08:17
text --> IA5 ?, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:38

April 06, 1991

new 822 list is alive!, David Paul Zimmerman, 12:12