Re: Content-Label

Excerpts from internet.ietf-822: 25-Apr-91 Re: Comments on Draft RFC
Vincent Lau(_at_)eng(_dot_)sun(_dot_)com (1843)

The value in Content-Label is controlled by the user, but Message-ID 
is not.  The information in Content-Label is intended for human being.


Now I'm really confused.  What, in this case, is Content-Label actually
for?  I had assumed its primary purpose was to allow certain parts to
reference each other to form complex structured multipart mail, but this
statement implies that I've entirely missed your motivation.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: multiple Content-Encoding:'s, (continued) Re: multiple Content-Encoding:'s, David Herron Re: multiple Content-Encoding:'s, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: what should Content-Encoding cover?, Bill Janssen Re: what should Content-Encoding cover?, Erik E. Fair Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Neil Katin Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Tom Morris - Digital Equipment - Valbonne, France 25-Apr-1991 1542 Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Vincent Lau Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Greg Vaudreuil Re: Content-Label, Nathaniel Borenstein <= Re: Content-Label, Einar Stefferud Re: Content-Label, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Content-Label, Einar Stefferud Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Neil Katin Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Ned Freed, Postmaster

Previous by Date:	Re: multiple Content-Encoding:'s, Nathaniel Borenstein
Next by Date:	Re: support for all content types, Keld J\|rn Simonsen
Previous by Thread:	Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Greg Vaudreuil
Next by Thread:	Re: Content-Label, Einar Stefferud
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]