Re: Comments on Draft RFC

I agree with your choices here, but I think these sorts of things belong
in an X.400 mapping RFC, not RFC-XXXX.

                                Ned

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Comments on Draft RFC, (continued) Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Tom Morris - Digital Equipment - Valbonne, France 25-Apr-1991 1542 Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Vincent Lau Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Greg Vaudreuil Re: Content-Label, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Content-Label, Einar Stefferud Re: Content-Label, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Content-Label, Einar Stefferud Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Neil Katin Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Ned Freed, Postmaster <=

Previous by Date:	Part versus MultiPart, continued, Ned Freed, Postmaster
Next by Date:	et VISUAL=emacs, Peter Vanderbilt
Previous by Thread:	Re: Comments on Draft RFC, Nathaniel Borenstein
Next by Thread:	support for all character sets, Erik M. van der Poel
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]