ietf-822
[
Top
]
[
All Lists
]
<prev
[
Date
]
next>
[
Advanced
]
<prev
[
Thread
]
next>
Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX
1991-10-24 16:09:54
from [
Nathaniel Borenstein
]
[
Permanent Link
]
I have no problem at all with Vincent's proposed BNF change.
[
More with this subject...
]
<Prev in Thread
]
Current Thread
[
Next in Thread>
Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX
,
Vincent Lau
re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX
,
Mark Crispin
Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX
,
Keith Moore
Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX
,
Nathaniel Borenstein
<=
Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX
,
Ned Freed, Postmaster
Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX
,
Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD)
Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX
,
Keith Moore
Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX
,
henry
Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX
,
Nathaniel Borenstein
encodings, base-64, etc.
,
henry
Re: encodings, base-64, etc.
,
Nathaniel Borenstein
Re: encodings, base-64, etc.
,
Craig_Everhart
Re: encodings, base-64, etc.
,
Rudy_Nedved
Re: encodings, base-64, etc.
,
Bill Janssen
Previous by Date:
Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX
,
Keith Moore
Next by Date:
Re: SPEAK NOW OR HOLD YOUR PEACE (Was Re: Yet another proposal for non-ASCII chars in headers)
,
Ned Freed, Postmaster
Previous by Thread:
Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX
,
Keith Moore
Next by Thread:
Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX
,
Ned Freed, Postmaster
Indexes:
[
Date
] [
Thread
] [
Top
] [
All Lists
]