Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX

Vincent is right -- I had been meaning to point this one out but hadn't
gotten to it yet.

                                        Ned

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Vincent Lau re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Mark Crispin Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Keith Moore Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Ned Freed, Postmaster <= Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD) Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Keith Moore Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, henry Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein encodings, base-64, etc., henry Re: encodings, base-64, etc., Nathaniel Borenstein Re: encodings, base-64, etc., Craig_Everhart Re: encodings, base-64, etc., Rudy_Nedved Re: encodings, base-64, etc., Bill Janssen Re: encodings, base-64, etc., Mark Crispin

Previous by Date:	more content-charset stuff, Neil Katin
Next by Date:	Re: comments on October draft, jknowles
Previous by Thread:	Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Nathaniel Borenstein
Next by Thread:	Re: Comment on encapsulation BNF in latest RFC-XXXX, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD)
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]