... (after domain-style addresses are finally implemented)
+4159408776(_at_)fax(_dot_)attmail(_dot_)com
I think this is definitely more intuitive than something like
fax(_at_)6(_dot_)7(_dot_)7(_dot_)8(_dot_)0(_dot_)4(_dot_)9(_dot_)5(_dot_)1(_dot_)4(_dot_)1(_dot_)attmail(_dot_)com(_dot_)
More intuitive yes, more scalable no. Of course, one would hope that
the user would have a UI that would deal with the actual formation of
the address. Perhaps even something that would take it in your format
and map it to the tpc.int format...
/mtr