Re: NULL

Are those boundary-related CRLF's to be always in 8-bit bytes ?


Yes.  IMHO, 1521 uses the term CRLF in many instances where it
*should* be using 0x0D 0x0A.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: NULL, (continued) Re: NULL, Ned Freed Re: NULL, Harald . T . Alvestrand Re: NULL, Steve Dorner Re: NULL, Masataka Ohta Re: NULL, Harald . T . Alvestrand Re: NULL, Michael D'Errico Re: NULL, John Gardiner Myers Re: NULL, Masataka Ohta Re: NULL, Matti Aarnio Re: NULL, John Gardiner Myers Re: NULL, Keith Moore <= Re: NULL, Ned Freed Re: NULL, Ned Freed Re: NULL, Harald . T . Alvestrand Re: NULL, Masataka Ohta Re: NULL, Harald . T . Alvestrand About C-T-Es and transports (Re: NULL), Harald . T . Alvestrand Re: About C-T-Es and transports (Re: NULL), Masataka Ohta Re: About C-T-Es and transports (Re: NULL), Harald . T . Alvestrand Re: NULL, Masataka Ohta Re: NULL, Valdis . Kletnieks