Re: NULL

> > Are those boundary-related CRLF's to be always in 8-bit bytes ?
> Yes.  IMHO, 1521 uses the term CRLF in many instances where it
> *should* be using 0x0D 0x0A.
Since in RFC1521 the term CRLF is *explicitly* *defined* to be a 0x0D 0x0A
sequence, I really don't see why this is necessary. See section 2.

                                Ned