ietf-822
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Don't change RFC822 for the worse!

1994-12-12 21:32:30
< The problem is that neither 822 nor MIME addresses the issue of I18N.

As you say, 822 was never intended to address the issues of
internationalization. So don't expect to be able to do internationalization
within its framework. PERIOD!

Regardless of what the original intention is, RFC 822 is already used
for the framework of the internationalization. PERIOD.

You claim that MIME does not address internationalization either, instead
claiming that the use of iso-2022-* can. You may be right, and you may be
wrong, but at this point, it's irrelevant. One thing that MIME does do well
is to allow you to use iso-2022-* globally in an international community
without any hindrance<<.

Not at all. MIME only covers MIME comformant e-mail.

If you use MIME, no one will be able to complain
about your use of iso-2022-*. If you don't use MIME for your iso-2022-*
email, expect lots of complaints. End of story.

No, we don't use MIME for everything.

                                                        Masataka Ohta

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>