Re: MIME's "Content-Disposition" Header

There is one operating system I am aware of, Archimedes RISCOS, that
uses '.' as a directory separator.  I don't think truly portable
filenames are going to be interesting enough to worry about.

I can think of some cases, such as a MIME shar-equivalent, where I
would likely want to include relative path information in the filename
parameters.

-- 
_.John G. Myers         Internet: jgm+(_at_)CMU(_dot_)EDU
                        LoseNet:  ...!seismo!ihnp4!wiscvm.wisc.edu!give!up

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: MIME's "Content-Disposition" Header, (continued) Re: MIME's "Content-Disposition" Header, Ned Freed MIME's "Content-Disposition" Header, MARKJOSEPH Re: MIME's "Content-Disposition" Header, Keith Moore Re: MIME's "Content-Disposition" Header, Rens Troost Re: MIME's "Content-Disposition" Header, Ned Freed Re: MIME's "Content-Disposition" Header, hansen Re: MIME's "Content-Disposition" Header, Steve Dorner Re: MIME's "Content-Disposition" Header, Steve Dorner Re: MIME's "Content-Disposition" Header, Pete Resnick Re: MIME's "Content-Disposition" Header, Ned Freed Re: MIME's "Content-Disposition" Header, John Gardiner Myers <= Re: MIME's "Content-Disposition" Header, Patrik Faltstrom Re: MIME's "Content-Disposition" Header, Olle Jarnefors Re: MIME's "Content-Disposition" Header, Olle Jarnefors Re: MIME's "Content-Disposition" Header, Harald . T . Alvestrand Re: MIME's "Content-Disposition" Header, Steve Dorner Re: MIME's "Content-Disposition" Header, Brent Stilley