"Keith" == Keith Moore <moore(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu> writes:
Keith> I'd rather amend this to say:
Keith> The Content-Disposition header is optional. In the
Keith> absence of a Content-Disposition header, the manner in which
Keith> the body part should be presented is undefined.
Keith> Actually, I think it's out-of-scope for the
Keith> Content-Disposition document to define what happens when the
Keith> header is not present.
I agree. It's caused a lot of religious dissent in all the
discussions, and it's really a matter of style. At the time, I was
following the metamail/andrew style. Let's use your wording.
-Rens