[Top] [All Lists]

Re: MIME's "Content-Disposition" Header

1995-01-13 13:43:46

"Keith" == Keith Moore <moore(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu> writes:

  Keith> I'd rather amend this to say:

  Keith>     The Content-Disposition header is optional.  In the
  Keith> absence of a Content-Disposition header, the manner in which
  Keith> the body part should be presented is undefined.

  Keith> Actually, I think it's out-of-scope for the
  Keith> Content-Disposition document to define what happens when the
  Keith> header is not present.

I agree. It's caused a lot of religious dissent in all the
discussions, and it's really a matter of style. At the time, I was
following the metamail/andrew style. Let's use your wording.