RE: overdefining text/plain?

The right way to send "hairy" rtf would be something like application/rtf
(assuming it existed).  Goodness only knows what "hairy" means, of course.


Agreed. And I've yet to see any RTF didn't at least have quite a bit of stubble
on it...

                                Ned

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: overdefining text/plain?, (continued) Re: overdefining text/plain?, Erik Huizer Re: overdefining text/plain?, Erik Huizer RE: overdefining text/plain?, Dan Kohn RE: overdefining text/plain?, Ned Freed RE: overdefining text/plain?, Steve Dorner Re: overdefining text/plain?, Michael A Quinlan Re: overdefining text/plain?, Ned Freed Re: overdefining text/plain?, Michael A Quinlan RE: overdefining text/plain?, Dan Kohn RE: overdefining text/plain?, Steve Dorner RE: overdefining text/plain?, Ned Freed <=