At 10:39 AM -0400 10/8/98, Valdis(_dot_)Kletnieks(_at_)vt(_dot_)edu wrote:
Yes, you can point Reply-To: at a bogus address, or a /dev/null
What sort of relies are we trying to prevent? Automated or manual?
Automated replies should be prohibited with a null return path. Manual
replies really can't be prohibited, because (a) the user can always
override whatever the mailer does, and (b) we don't have a header that
means "use this reply address instead of any/all others, for all types
of replies".
I suppose if you're sending a message and want non-delivery reports,
but don't want users to reply, and the message is only going to one
user, the suggestion of an empty group in the Reply-To header is the
best one.