Re: The transition to UTF-8 header fields

So long as the reader
displays _something_ distinct for every possible combination of octets
received, nothing is going to break.


Replacing the proper 8859-1 characters with ``_something_'' will annoy
the users.


As explained earlier, while this might be a problem with other character
sets, this is extremely unlikely to happen with 8859/1.

Keith

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: The transition to UTF-8 header fields, (continued) Re: The transition to UTF-8 header fields, Patrik Fältström Re: The transition to UTF-8 header fields, Tim Showalter Re: The transition to UTF-8 header fields, Keith Moore 8-bit message bodies, Q-P conversion, and 8BITMIME, D. J. Bernstein Re: 8-bit message bodies, Q-P conversion, and 8BITMIME, Keith Moore Re: The transition to UTF-8 header fields, Charles Lindsey Re: The transition to UTF-8 header fields, D. J. Bernstein Re: The transition to UTF-8 header fields, Keith Moore Re: The transition to UTF-8 header fields, Charles Lindsey Re: The transition to UTF-8 header fields, D. J. Bernstein Re: The transition to UTF-8 header fields, Keith Moore <= Re: The transition to UTF-8 header fields, Charles Lindsey Re: The transition to UTF-8 header fields, Charles Lindsey Re: The transition to UTF-8 header fields, Keith Moore Re: The transition to UTF-8 header fields, Charles Lindsey Re: The transition to UTF-8 header fields, Keith Moore Re: The transition to UTF-8 header fields, Charles Lindsey Re: The transition to UTF-8 header fields, Keith Moore Re: The transition to UTF-8 header fields, Charles Lindsey Re: The transition to UTF-8 header fields, Charles Lindsey Re: The transition to UTF-8 header fields, D. J. Bernstein