Requesting yet again. Could we please have details of this horrible
problem inflicted by the -xml suffix?
Thanks. Without details, we can only circle.
KM>>or to put it another way, if we're going to invent a new syntatical
KM>>convention for describing content-type characteristics, let's
KM>>pick one that actually works with content negotiation
KM>>rather than one which requires drastic changes to content
KM>>negotiation frameworks.
SSL>I have yet to hear what those 'drastic changes' involve. More details
SSL>would be greatly appreciated.
I would still appreciate details describing the consquences of this risk.
Thanks!
Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth
http://www.simonstl.com