Re: draft-klyne-msghdr-registry-00.txt

> Sorry, the header I meant to pick on was "Reply-To:".
well, the current status is standards-track, of course.

though I could make a case for deprecating it, I don't propose
to make that argument in the context of the discussion on the
registry document.  if we use that document as an excuse to 
debate the legitimacy of every header field that's defined in
an RFC it will take 20 years.

Keith