In <200202041412(_dot_)g14EC8919852(_at_)astro(_dot_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu>
Keith Moore <moore(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu> writes:
I don't see any reason at all that IESG should be spending much
time debating ideas that don't have a supporting constituency
larger than the set of authors of the document just in order to
keep it from looking like IETF is supporting their boneheaded ideas.
In that case you let the Area Director, or his nominated expert, be the
first line of defence. Then the IESG only needs to get involved if the
expert's ruling is appealed.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clw(_dot_)cs(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5
Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5