-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 03 May 2002 15:22, Charles Lindsey wrote:
<snip>
Although actually, simply encoding it with RFC 2047 might be a sensible
move. It is not strictly allowed, but we have just seen that lots of
mailers do it,
Correction: Most mailers simply encode the whole addr-spec (some with, some
sans the enclosing <>'s), only your mailer (dtmail?) did a good job at not
encoding the @<>'s.
However, the changes to existing mailers would probably be minimal.
Following is the complete patch[1] to make KMail skip the @, so that it's
output is the same as dtmails:
- -const QString dontQuote = "\"()<>,";
+const QString dontQuote = "\"()<>,@";
and it would at least ensure the mail for moderators
arrived at a site which had an interest in disentangling it.
Marc
[1] though KMail has other problems than that w.r.t. addresses: It doesn't
(yet) have a rfc822 tokenizer :-(
- --
Marc Mutz <mutz(_at_)kde(_dot_)org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE80wS43oWD+L2/6DgRAksvAJ9nH5VokqYl3FFhpLJjbby0GejZcwCdFd4e
YEaN4ikl52GnrB+lbpR3/Eg=
=J2Yn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----