Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter)

No, because the only standardised 7-bit encoding for unicode is UTF-7 
that has so many drawbacks it's strongly deprecated.


There is another standardized encoding for iso-10646, namely mnemonic in
RFC 1345.


RFC 1345 is an informational document.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Call for Usefor to recharter, Dan Kohn Re: Call for Usefor to recharter, ned+ietf-822 Re: Call for Usefor to recharter, Russ Allbery Re: Call for Usefor to recharter, Charles Lindsey UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Jean-Marc Desperrier Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Dave Crocker Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Jean-Marc Desperrier Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Keld Jørn Simonsen Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Keith Moore <= Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Keld Jørn Simonsen Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Charles Lindsey Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Dave Crocker Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Charles Lindsey Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Bruce Lilly Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047 (Re: Call for Usefor to recharter), Bruce Lilly RE: Call for Usefor to recharter, Dan Kohn RE: Call for Usefor to recharter, Erland Sommarskog Re: Call for Usefor to recharter, Jean-Marc Desperrier RE: Call for Usefor to recharter, Dan Kohn