ietf-822
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Historical trivia

2003-01-15 04:32:05

"Rolf E. Sonneveld" <r(_dot_)e(_dot_)sonneveld(_at_)sonnection(_dot_)nl> wrote 

But alphanumerical timezones has always been ambiguous 
as I'm quite sure you will be able to find other use of MET and WET. I 
think the numeric format has the future.

Unfortunately, as we discovered in the iCalendar working group, numeric 
format works for present times and for past times (if one can determine 
what the UTC offset was on that date). Unfortunately, it doesn't work for 
some future times. This is because the DST rules for that location may 
change (for a whole variety of reasons). Thus, for future times, one is 
forced to employ a geographic area designator that in the case of 
iCalendar is registered with IANA. But given geopolitical realities, even 
this binding may change over time.

Nick

Nick Shelness
Independent Technology Consultant <nick(_at_)old-mill(_dot_)net>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>