Re: Multi-message reply and "References:"


Arnt,

AG> A lot of clients seem to put random junk into references and 
AG> in-reply-to. Why would their "threads" generation be any more 
AG> trustworthy?

Good point.  Use of the data needs to be robust against incomplete or
incorrect information, where possible.


d/
--
 Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker(_at_)brandenburg(_dot_)com>
 Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
 Sunnyvale, CA  USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>, <fax:+1.866.358.5301>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Multi-message reply and "References:", (continued) Re: Multi-message reply and "References:", Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Multi-message reply and "References:", D. J. Bernstein Re: Multi-message reply and "References:", Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Multi-message reply and "References:", Cyrus Daboo Re: Multi-message reply and "References:", D. J. Bernstein Re: Multi-message reply and "References:", Arnt Gulbrandsen Re: Multi-message reply and "References:", Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Multi-message reply and "References:", Graham Klyne Re: Multi-message reply and "References:", Dave Crocker Re: Multi-message reply and "References:", Arnt Gulbrandsen Re: Multi-message reply and "References:", Dave Crocker <= Re: Multi-message reply and "References:", Bruce Lilly Re: Multi-message reply and "References:", D. J. Bernstein Re: Multi-message reply and "References:", Adam M. Costello Re: Multi-message reply and "References:", Bruce Lilly Re: Multi-message reply and "References:", Bruce Lilly