Re: New Internet Draft: draft-duerst-archived-at-00.txt

Bill McQuillan <McQuilWP(_at_)pobox(_dot_)com> wrote:

> I guess that the data object that we are missing here is
> the Archive itself with some sort of standardized access
> protocol.  Then the Archived-At field becomes some sort of
> <msgarch://host.name/archive.name?msg-id>.
You mean like <imap://host/mailbox/;UID=uid> ?

(See RFC-2192.)

AMC