On Thu October 28 2004 09:09, Graham Klyne wrote:
To paraphrase (British) parliament-speak: I refer the gentleman to the
answer given previously:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Oct/0050.html
That does not explain the utility of the particular structured
header field proposed (vs. e.g. an unstructured Comments field
or a parenthesized comment in e.g. the Message-ID field, or
text in a body part, etc., all of which would be at least as
usable for clickety-clickety or copy and paste).