Scenario:
I post to a mailing list, and include a multipart, one of
which is a message/rfc822. My MUA software takes the entire message
as it lives in the message store, and sends it off. When my copy
comes back from the mailing list, the PGP signature is busticated.
Why? Because the first few lines outbound looked like:
+++ Start outbound copy here
------- =_aaaaaaaaaa0
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-ID:
<3230(_dot_)1099595697(_dot_)2(_at_)turing-police(_dot_)cc(_dot_)vt(_dot_)edu>
Content-Description: forwarded message
From owner-test-l(_at_)LISTSERV(_dot_)VT(_dot_)EDU Thu Nov 4 14:12:36 2004
Return-Path: <owner-test-l(_at_)LISTSERV(_dot_)VT(_dot_)EDU>
Received: from localhost
(IDENT:valdis(_at_)turing-police(_dot_)cc(_dot_)vt(_dot_)edu [127.0.0.1])
by turing-police.cc.vt.edu (8.13.
1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iA4JCU9n014549 for
<valdis(_at_)turing-police(_dot_)cc(_dot_)vt(_dot_)edu>; Thu, 4 Nov 2004
14:12:35 -0500
+++ end outbound copy
(Yes, one long line - that was done by a local procmail rule).
+++ Start as-received here
------- =_aaaaaaaaaa0
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-ID:
<3230(_dot_)1099595697(_dot_)2(_at_)turing-police(_dot_)cc(_dot_)vt(_dot_)edu>
Content-Description: forwarded message
Return-Path: <owner-test-l(_at_)LISTSERV(_dot_)VT(_dot_)EDU>
Received: from localhost
(IDENT:valdis(_at_)turing-police(_dot_)cc(_dot_)vt(_dot_)edu [127.0.0.1]) by
turing-police.cc.vt.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
iA4JCU9n014549 for
<valdis(_at_)turing-police(_dot_)cc(_dot_)vt(_dot_)edu>;
Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:12:35 -0500
+++ End as-received
1) I am presuming that the mailing list is at fault for unwrapping the
Received: line? (or more correctly, "the piece of software that did the
unwrapping should be fixed")?
2) Am I at fault for including the mbox-style 'From ' line, or is
the mailing list (or whoever did it) at fault for removing it?
pgpDKDlUyaGNy.pgp
Description: PGP signature