Re: 2 MIME questions re: message/rfc822
2004-11-04 21:42:48
This may seem like splitting hairs, because I agree that the sender
caused the initial problem, but are you saying that because the
message/rfc822 object was incorrectly formatted (because of the
inclusion of the From line), the downstream software was justified in
throwing that offending line away? I'm skeptical because it doesn't
actually make anything better, and it seems to me that "correcting"
the contents is far more likely to cause harm than good. -- Nathaniel
yeah, maybe I misunderstood, but my take was that the problem was
caused by the some intermediary which did not treat the message/rfc822
body part as an opaque object. that seems like a bug regardless of
whether the From_ line is there. though I suppose if it went through
an 8bit to 7bit conversion the intermediary would be expected to
convert any internal message/rfc822 body parts to 7bit also, and such
a conversion might be confused by a From_ line.
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- 2 MIME questions re: message/rfc822, Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: 2 MIME questions re: message/rfc822, Tony Hansen
- Re: 2 MIME questions re: message/rfc822, Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: 2 MIME questions re: message/rfc822, Tony Hansen
- Re: 2 MIME questions re: message/rfc822,
Keith Moore <=
- Re: 2 MIME questions re: message/rfc822, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: 2 MIME questions re: message/rfc822, Keith Moore
- Re: 2 MIME questions re: message/rfc822, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: 2 MIME questions re: message/rfc822, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: 2 MIME questions re: message/rfc822, Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: 2 MIME questions re: message/rfc822, ned+ietf-822
- Re: 2 MIME questions re: message/rfc822, Bruce Lilly
- Re: 2 MIME questions re: message/rfc822, ned+ietf-822
- Re: 2 MIME questions re: message/rfc822, Bruce Lilly
- Re: 2 MIME questions re: message/rfc822, Bruce Lilly
|
|
|