Pete Resnick wrote:
[Cc'ing our ADs just in case they didn't notice this.]
On 5/8/07 at 8:48 AM -0700, Dave Crocker wrote:
Are we sure that the proposed changes would not require re-cycling
RFC2822 at Proposed Standard?
I can't see why. The only real change here is to remove "no-fold-quote"
from the "allowed to generate" syntax for message ids. (Of course we
still require that they be interpreted.) I think this amounts to
"removing an unused/non-interoperable feature", which is a *desirable*
thing when moving to Draft.
ahh. right. merely dropping an unused construct.
i thought I was seeing suggestions for making real semantic changes.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net