ietf-822
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SUMMARY: Limiting msg-id generate syntax

2007-05-08 13:38:17

On 5/8/07 at 9:58 PM +0200, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:

Dave Crocker writes:
Are we sure that the proposed changes would not require re-cycling RFC2822 at Proposed Standard?

Hm. I reread 1602 now and can't find any text saying that standards-track progression should drop unused features. Isn't there any?

RFC 2026, section 4.1.2:

   In cases in which one or more options or features
   have not been demonstrated in at least two interoperable
   implementations, the specification may advance to the Draft Standard
   level only if those options or features are removed.

pr
--
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
QUALCOMM Incorporated