Ha! Yammer-To-Author! Hilarious!
Thanks for making my day. :-)
Hector Santos, CTO
Steve Dorner wrote:
At 9:14 AM -0800 12/5/07, Dave Crocker wrote:
Frankly I think [Resent-] should be deprecated, because it causes so
Along with From, Sender, and Reply-To. :-)
I see no straightening out of the tangle we are in regarding all these
fields. We keep trying to tweak the rules, tweak compliance, etc, so
that we get a system where everybody can conveniently do what they want,
and I don't think it's possible.
Frankly, I think we either just give it up and live with it, or define
entirely new fields with narrow, specific meanings that enable agents to
put together the operations we like.
Eg, deprecate (softly and over time) Sender, and replace with:
Deprecate Reply-To:, and replace with:
We have to get very specific about labelling who did what to whom if we
hope to have a situation that is satisfying to our sense of the right
progression of the universe.
Some of these fields probably would need to be multiple, and even
order-maintained. They might need syntax above and beyond what is
currently allowed for recipient fields. There would probably be a fair
number of them.
But there's so much useless junk flying around in email now, several
dozen more addressing fields would hardly be noticed. :-)
My guess is that "living with it" is going to win.
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to