IETF 822 (date)
December 05, 2007
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity), Hector Santos, 14:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity), Hector Santos, 14:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity), Dave Crocker, 14:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity), Steve Dorner, 13:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity), Tony Finch, 12:55
- Re: Handling of NO-WS-CTL in 2822bis, Tony Finch, 12:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity), Tony Finch, 12:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity), Dave Crocker, 10:17
- Re: Handling of NO-WS-CTL in 2822bis, Philip Guenther, 09:31
December 04, 2007
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs.Validity), Frank Ellermann, 18:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity), Hector Santos, 18:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity), ned+dkim, 17:50
- Re: Handling of NO-WS-CTL in 2822bis, Frank Ellermann, 17:02
- Re: Handling of NO-WS-CTL in 2822bis, Dave Crocker, 16:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity), Pete Resnick, 16:54
- Re: Handling of NO-WS-CTL in 2822bis, Pete Resnick, 11:29
- Re: Handling of NO-WS-CTL in 2822bis, Charles Lindsey, 10:35