Hadmut Danisch wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:17:21PM +0000, Martin hepworth wrote:
wouldn't it be better to specify an XML schema so you can track the
incoming message format version for syntax checking? I know http has
it's uses, but doing an ugly back fit schema was a pain.
Well, that's something I didn't think about. I was focussed on
a HTTP approach and didn't even spend a second about XML. Maybe
that's better, while I still prefer the HTTP style, which does
the job very well, I think.
But I agree, XML could be more powerful. The disadvantage is that
it might be difficult to keep the RFC 822 email structure...
Hadmut
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
Well just as easy to keep the mail structure as with http. You still
need a starting doctype defn to be http1.1 compliant don't you?
--
Martin Hepworth
Senior Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic Ltd
+44 (0)1865 842300
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg