In <20030306100320(_dot_)5b612539(_dot_)moore(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu>
Keith Moore <moore(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu> writes:
In the very same simple way I have changed the MX record for
danisch.de and the A record for www.danisch.de when a new
there are things I thought were obvious too - such as that it's cumbersome to
maintain such records, that such records are likely to get out of sync with
reality, and that they're not generally applicable.
Why are reverse MX records or domain specific DNSBLs any harder to
maintain that regular MX records?
-wayne
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg