On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 02:43:44PM -0600, wayne wrote:
In
<Pine(_dot_)LNX(_dot_)4(_dot_)44(_dot_)0303091858570(_dot_)29236-100000(_at_)localhost(_dot_)localdomain>
Matt Sergeant <msergeant(_at_)startechgroup(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk> writes:
If the 5 rules map to a different part of the address space of all spam
then the filter is 100% effective. That was the point.
Right. And that brings up a related point. If a spam test can be
worked around by doing <foo>, that is still ok if that moves the
spammer into part of the address space that other tests work on. As
Damon Sauer says, we need to pen, trap and kill the spammers.
(Skinning is preferable to me also.)
Well, that is the whole idea behind SA's use of lots of different test types,
after all ;)
--j.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg