Tom Thomson wrote:
Message: 44
From: Paul Judge <paul(_dot_)judge(_at_)ciphertrust(_dot_)com>
After more thought and feeedback from some people on the list, here is a
second draft of the taxonomy of anti-spam systems.
The systems are classified into prevention, deterrence, and reaction
approaches.
I like the idea of getting a good classification, but there are a few things
wrong with this attempt.
I think you've left out an important option in the reaction approaches list.
Why not add
j) Try to punish
I agree partially, but for a different reason. The taxonomy _should_
include socio-legal techniques -
a) to recognize that some laws do exist
b) provide a basis for the ASRG to hang discussions on laws -
while it's outside of our direct purview, some of the
practises we may end up recommending will _require_ legal
teeth to be effective.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg