You are absolutely correct. In my opinion these schemes are being rejected
because they lack some basic appeal, without regard to their feasibility in
terms of deployment and use within an existing large-scale service.
On Friday 21 March 2003 11:13 am, Dave Crocker wrote:
David,
Friday, March 21, 2003, 6:26:42 AM, you wrote:
DW> There is a reason these ideas keep getting proposed. The idea is
solid.
Many ideas that are otherwise wonderful prove unworkable when they
must be applied to a working system. Many ideas that are otherwise
wonderful prove unworkable when they must be applied to a system with
a hundred million users.
Too often, ideas are evaluated on their basic appeal, rather than
their serious feasibility in terms of deployment and use within an
existing, large-scale service.
d/
--
Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker(_at_)brandenburg(_dot_)com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
Sunnyvale, CA USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>, <fax:+1.866.358.5301>
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg