On Monday, March 31, 2003, at 01:43 PM, Jason Hihn wrote:
what you are looking for is called "imap" (heh)
I don't think so. After I pull it down off my mail server, I still want
global access. I don't want to leave my mail on the server. I know
that's
what imap does. Are you suggesting that I run an imap server on my
local
machine too?
if you're seriously interested in "getting it exactly the way I want
it", probably. Because then you're in control of it.
Actually yes. Not quite that many though. No one has a 'favorite',
they just
don't like change. That's my finding anyway. That's why some people
still
use pine. ;-)
heh. point taken, although it's really both...
which is actually a legitimate issue to be dealt with on this list...
Nah, I believe SPAM should be dealt with in a client-transparent way.
(Infrastructure changes, not client ones, unless your client is a
source of
spam, which is the case for Outlook)
I think there are uses for (and we're going to need) both.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg